Although processed extremely cheap, it meets at least its purpose.
My criticism of the technical design:
1 million years the hot shoe at each manufacturer was the same (left).
If an experienced premium manufacturer can not make it a "normal" accessory shoe in a yet sufficiently large housing assemble ... and then calls 3-10% of the Camera Prize for the piece, so arises already the question of whether made with the accessories the margin shall be ?!
Apart from this, the manufacturer has a more "advertising space" with the company name, for which one must pay as users still ...