Unfortunately, it was the then already :-(
The rotary design is perhaps an idea whether it is so useful, I doubt it! The stability suffers greatly, which is vibrated by vigorous and makes gewackle noticeable.
Well a Diavel is certainly not the most gentle as regards the engine running, but my predecessor the Rider V4 was seen as simply nothing to. What if then the vertical position is assumed, then dares the holder to not much. Well with this upright orientation when the time is then recognized or perhaps even no, rotating the part sometimes even several times around the lummelige bracket and then decides it to the horizontal. This alignment, brought me sometimes even to astonishment when the Rider has simply times rotated the map 90 degrees just so or maybe the late response to the rotational movement before.
The menu operation I find somewhat unfamiliar and confusing, which certainly are at some point and will be the norm.
Unfortunately, I failed to connect from the desktop or from the Win7 laptop Win10 and the Rider 400.
For me, anyway endtäuschend because I have applied the development from Rider 1 to the current Rider gaps. To date, it has not managed TomTom to construct a reasonable bracket. From broken locking lugs to torn threaded inserts and now with the rotatable holder in my eyes, complete junk.
The thing get back to me by return mail, as homework not done !!!
PS: If someone has a Rider 400 holder for the Diavel needs, simply log sB