Seriously ?? 3 1

I had also read and write a comment on "Murder to Redemption," a book that I had not come down. Far from there. I had even defended. Saying that if Giebel decidedly not made in the line of good writers (please, it ceases styles tests here and there, they are repetitions, sudden changes of narrator or images of elevator poetry This is a disaster.) it had the merit of having written a gripping story, panting, violent, daring.

So is this time quite differently. If the feather capacity unfortunately has not changed, the story is smaller and uninspired. Guided by the excellent grades posted here, argued "the best of his novels," I have made myself. This does not absolutely captivated me, far from it. The mystery remains a very long time since the three possible suspects, the culprit is quickly identifiable as part of its procedure. But worse than that, the characters are not engaging, psychologically very superficially worked, moving from one state to another in a totally implausible. In fact Cloe and Alexander have little credibility as a whole. They become malleable in their moods and states with the sole aim to serve the story. Mistake of the author who wants to complete his idea that more consistency and density.

It's heavy, expected, without much interest. I think only the last page was a good surprise.
In short, no form as usual, but additionally no bottom this time.