The enormous ego of the writer

Before page 178, I still hesitated to review this book 10-1. 10 Soral and 1 Naulleau.
Appreciating Soral and sharing many of these thèses- but in a Permanent- doubt and who liked Naulleau thanks to its pleasant rhetoric, culture, etc., I went into this book with a sincere desire to discover arguments against weight-face the mechanical soralienne. How disappointing. I found in front of a critical Soral-writer who had no other arguments as literary quotations and false disagreements of principle then admitted his agreement. I had a glimmer of hope when he blamed his obsession in Soral of the Holocaust and his way of talking ... but the subject is the exploitation of the Holocaust for purposes perverse and all the consequences this entails not the modesty and losers forgotten victims ... (you'll understand when you read the book).
The more I advanced in the book and to the weakness of Naulleau and I wondered about the reasons that pushed it to face Soral. It seems that the "soraliens" Naulleau respect for his courage. Rather than courage, I see now an injury, vexation: Naulleau was upset that Soral would question its culture, and as a child in a playground, he wanted to wash his honor. A he succeeded? I do not think so. Instead, he only further enhance the theses of Soral.