Few thoughts on the story that focus on the discipline of history as a practice and writing. The author of "History and psychoanalysis between science and fiction" puts all the energy to explain with boundless generosity, the contribution of underground structures (writing, social field, institution, address, etc.) in the manufacture of historical discourse. Beyond the concepts and abstractions, Michel de Certeau signals the unfortunate forgetting of history as a social practice and graphical reason inextricably tied to multiple conditions that produce not only "history" but also a "scientific discourse" on discipline and terms to "understand" the event. A book worth reading!
