I had long been waiting for this game and as I became shortly after release the first reviews here read almost completely different. Nevertheless, I have dared to buy Resident Evil 6 and was not disappointed.
Therefore, I would like once cudgels and especially prevent people from - put off negative reviews - I think unjustified. How like the boos come from? I really wonder what so everybody has expected.
Or I would have time to watch the faces, Capcom had a game in PS1 graphics, beautiful choppy published switchend from image to image, so that the "fans of the first hour" had been served.
Of course, the first games were great, no question. But no number of lives long without new ideas and changes and this trend was already evident from part 4. Wers not like okay, the place certainly a game that better suits his needs.
I also note that many Rezensionisten have the game obviously not played here and Resident Evil 6 had no chance. In my opinion, I can not because of "hearsay" and "have-I-somewhere-read" rate. This can be seen quite clearly in a number of incorrect information to the content and game concept in some reviews.
My conclusion: Resident Evil 6 is a solid action adventure zombie game. Who part 4 and 5 might be coming here as well at his expense. And above all, Resident Evil 6 is not a shooter!
The campaigns are varied and offer a long game. After all, we are talking about 20 chapters A 1-2 hours (at least on the first playthrough). As other games have to keep up first.
And an appeal to the "bad old hands": Who has not even played the game, may nevertheless hold back with criticism. And then you can talk a game badly by force, but by no means can it "better whining".
