I allowed myself a new camera before Christmas. I must say that I have seen pictures of friends who have made a DSLR images of our Sohnemann. Comparing these pictures with our digital compact camera, I noticed how much better the image quality. When looking for a compact and at the same time cheap DSLR with lens and good quality I've found quickly: "It'll Cost". There had to be another solution.
To my alternative:
I then read in a forum that there are quite favorable alternative ways to DSLR's. Here I first came to the concept of DSLM (Digital Single Lens Mirrorless) in contact.
What are DSLM:
As DSLM is called cameras that the known SLR (DSLR - Digital Single Lens Reflex) similar feature interchangeable lenses. They can therefore adjust the focal length requirements of the customers, while offering a pretty decent lens quality. So they are to be subdivided into a housing (body called) and the lenses as with DSLR. Depending on the manufacturer (and price), there are additional configurations with built-in flash and electronic viewfinders.
What is the main difference between DSLR and DSLM:
With DSLR's main feature, that through the optical viewfinder through the lens (the lens) looks. You could do this as a WYSIWYG (What you see is what you get) the photograph designate. That's just for professionals a huge advantage, especially as the images presented electronically (on the display or the electronic viewfinder) of DSLM can partly strongly differ from the original, and make judgments concerning the aperture, shutter speed, focus, etc. difficult. The DSLM simulate many of these effects digitally, while real DSLM show with optical viewfinder, the image through the lens as it is exposed on the sensor. So at SLR works a mirror that directs the gaze of the eye from the viewfinder through the lens in the normal state so that for this time falls on the image sensor, and not in the human eye. (There are also at DSLR prism structures, but which provide a darker viewfinder image and even provide even a viewfinder when you press the shutter button halfway)
Now for NX3000:
My choice was this camera, because they:
1. My budget corresponded (more than 300, I did not want to spend)
2. You could get good test results ...
3. ... even if you use the automatic function. (I'm beginner)
The camera provides the photo beginners everything you need. Tolle automatic functions as they also offer the candid cameras. (See my test of WB250F from Samsung) It must be acknowledged even ambitious beginners and amateurs to professionals who appreciate the compactness of the camera, be quite satisfied with this model.
Main Features:
Image resolution up to max. 5,472 x 3,648 pixels (3: 2)
-APS-C sensor with 20.4 million pixels
-Videoaufnahmen (1024p) Full HD
-Bildempfindlichkeit ISO 100 to 3200 (Auto), or to 25,600 (manual)
For plugging LIGHTNING on hotshoe (guide number 8)
-PASM (Program AE, aperture priority mode (Aperture priority), Shutter priority (shutter speed priority), Manual)
There is also the Best Face feature (continuous for blinzelfreie portrait photos) and many more features that I did not want to describe in detail, as this most cameras comply with (Party mode, sports mode, candle, toddler recording (with funny noises, so the little ones in Camera views)
Outside:
When a sufficient amount of light the NX3000 conjures really great pictures on the micro SD card. I made a sample photo on a winter day (sunshine), 16mm ISO100 with F / 5.0 and 1 / 200s exposure time. With great depth of field and well sharpened Eiszäpfchen. Wonderful! (Only I easily erhöt with Lightroom contrast, a software that is supplied and partly already powerful Funtionen brings)
Inside:
Here you can not complain, you can rely on the automatic. Only in low light, it may take some time until the camera focuses. Tip: In case of emergency and then swing back to a similarly close, better lit subject intentionally. Works quite well in practice. Alternatively remains the manual focus, unfortunately, has außkommen Peaking without focus. (Focus Peaking dyed a the edges of the objects are in focus.)
Conclusion:
I'm very satisfied. For this money you get, I think not much better (if at all). The colors are vivid, the images are so crisp (no comparison to WB250F, although not bad) battery life I find sufficient, even if no battery charger is to charge a second battery (About 300 images one creates almost always). Den there (with charger) for narrow money also on Amazon. I've appended an example image that I really like (Settings see above).
I would buy the camera again.
