+ PRO +
The installation is really simple, since you can not go wrong a lot. One should at
Had use of the full functionality (e-mail alert, FTP, etc.) before doing so
have, but it will not require any IT science. This part works virtually out
of the box and that's quite remarkable.
I have the instructions read only the beginning of what the order of commissioning
was concerned. For everything else I did not need it, that's self-explanatory.
CONTRA + +
Now for the things that are not so much like me.
- Image Quality.
in the era of FullHD I would have liked a slightly higher resolution, despite
the relatively acceptable price. A little more than 640 should be in there.
This is only an indication that deserves no devaluation - I knew that beforehand.
- Visibility of the night-LED
This is a star devaluation for me. The camera shimmers extremely clearly recognizable
red in the darkness that comes from the LED. I think that at a surveillance camera
for an unforgivable lapse, because their position is betrayed and now this order
can be effectively avoided or deliberately sabotaged. There are also LEDs that are not visible
Emit light. Let the be a little more expensive, the extra cost I would accept.
But this red, visible from afar light eye is not at all.
- Another star I draw from the underground bracket. The entire housing
Cast aluminum, ultra stable and high quality, and then a plastic holder, when you look
When setting not dare to shake off. Does it have to be that way? It must be possible,
settle something made of metal (cast aluminum), instead of thin plastic. The thing I trust Hanging
after all, the camera. I'll replace on occasion, the entire bracket
nothing more than plastic waste.
- Full functionality only with IE, which is actually unused with me. We live in
21st century, love INSTAR colleagues. Because something should not happen again. I pull
But no star from, too, is known in advance.
- Cable loom: How useful are the many connections, but it is too little
unruly monster it. Outside, you have to pack it all somehow,
one can hardly leave the network interface hanging open. I think that somehow
a pity that since no sensible and practical solution has been found.
All in all, the camera in order. She films, alarmed enough the image shown
to recognize what is going on (Land Monitoring). If INSTAR said Macken
would still eliminate a bit the resolution improve, a more universal web interface
would create, that would be an absolute top product.
I might actually be needed a second camera, but right now I'm undecided. Lieber more
Spend money and for an all around perfect product or live with the prints?