The many different Nonamer, Refiller and (robbery) copies have partly brought me mad and conveyed a printhead to the afterlife. Who only documents printed, can also good substitutes, such as dodge the Pelikäne. In the photos is not in my experience. Besides good photo paper I swear on the original cartridges from Canon. The bring the last bit of brilliance and color, in the partially made with much effort pictures. This may be represented for one or the other as a histrionic or even proselytizing statement but actually reflects the experiences made by me, which now has five different Canon printers again.
I think it's just evil to rack their brains about a subject and its image, this edit with expensive programs like Photo Shop, Lightroom and ACDPro on the calibrated monitor, and then get the image quality of a finger paints watercolor made in kindergarten at the printer.
Also difficulties with impurities or dried cartridges I have not, since I have the tests set by other manufacturers. No matter how long the printer is, it works.
What really gets me is the canonsche pricing of replacement ink, but that's me (m) easily worth a good picture. For that I grudgingly bite the bullet and denounce at this. Over and over again.