Beautiful and brave!

I am a historian and archaeologist by training, and as many of them have never acceded to the evolutionary theory * that the fundamentalists of science have imposed force as fact without ever proved anything, that's 20 years I waited for the publication of such a book.
And I am not disappointed because far from being part of one of the many sensations outgoing waste straight from the whimsical spirit of the usual excited that publish this kind of work, it is rather a work major scientific extremely serious and rigorous, which is in my opinion one of the most important archaeological publications that science has ever published.
This book marks the rash starting point of a new era to an objective and open archeology that will gradually stand out from the old schools (one might even say the sects in some cases) led by old obtuse and tyrannical dinosaurs.
The end of the scientific fundamentalism with his obscurantist networks in some intelligientsia mafia led by some mandarins who would never be in power at the head of the archaeological research hopefully it marks both because they are at the origin of the biased orientation of human thought by the arbitrary imposition of theories sometimes deliberately faked. And are unfortunately still accepted fact for over a century, even in primary school textbooks and nobody dares to think or contradict them.
One could even say that this is a crime against humanity since this mode of speculative thought directs all men who are in search of their past and thus their evolution toward false leads. Thus, all the concepts that are scaffolded from there are skewed because they are based on erroneous data.

* I said that when I denounces evolutionary theories, that are not those of CR Darwin but of prehistory, who hijacked and made erroneous Darwin's studies. These have been confirmed by geneticists of our time, when they discovered the existence of alleles (gene variant) that allow the genotype change to fit new situations. We see that Darwin never intended nor implied that living species have appeared to a primary condition to move towards an ultimate perfection, but that all species are constantly adapting to their environment (thus no basis for yet to know the state, changed or bestial, of the human species there are millions of years). Darwin's theory has not any connection with those prehistorians who claim the most speculative way possible, that the human species appeared in a state of ectoplasm there are a few million years, to tighten to our present state (implied for continuous improvement whether by intermingling or other). Darwin never spoke of it; adaptation is not synonymous with improvement, although this is one of its components, it must also be admitted that regressions genetically are the second aspect, because any adaptation is fleeting in itself in one way or another.