Debunking soulless

A priori, critical exam archetypes, heard in the Jungian sense, including the supposed invariance in time and in space pictorial symbols or narrative themes in which they sexprimeraient, will certainly prove interesting given the character sometimes rather vague and hypothetical, it is true, some of Jung's writings on the subject.
Unfortunately the heavy pad of 450 pages, written in a polemical style and constant spirit of disparagement, turns out to play a pure systematic demolition company, a laborious and logorrheic indictment against both Jung himself, as against its designs, rejecting systematically, in its relentless pursuit of "evidence", any validity, any relevant factor, positive or fruitful in the same notions and collective darchétype dinconscient, as developed by Jung. In short, sil had to summarize the thesis proposed by Quellec in his book, it would amount to this: the archetypes are found Jung's ideas in the field of the psyche and linconscient are entirely built on the empty and itself quun was confused thinker, "handyman" and opportunistic, and furthermore racist inspiration (especially anti-Semitic) at one time.
We may grant that some documentary evidence provided by the author to accredit this thesis no shortage dinterpeller the reader but it is it provided convincing? This is sad to say but the louvrage tone is so unpleasant, the author dexécration level vis-à-vis Jung is so extreme, so obvious, despite quen dun dune scholarship and critical equipment crushing, with its profusion of endless citations, one didnt even want to ask the question, both reading the book turns out depressing. So it is hoped that other critical biographies of Jung will emerge later, in a more measured style that this kind of debunking (dismantling) unbridled.