Old strengths and weaknesses: ISO and autofocus

The X100T is the X100S with a few minor adjustments. Whether this is likely to justify the additional cost be for each the real question. Chip and lens are the same, so you can not really expect a difference of the images - and not see (which must be not bad). The operation is also almost identical, so that one feels at home (if you can live with the menu) immediately.

Problem remains the autofocus. In daylight OK with PREFOCUS good (but not flashy fast). In low light, where the Fuji X100T would shine because of their sensational noise performance, the auto focus is to use the other hand, hardly. And I do not overnight, but room light intensity. A pity Fujifilm gets simply not under control :-(

Top of the camera
- ISO to 6400 practicable even at the JPGs and RAW anyway
- Silent
- Leaf shutter for high flash sync
- ND Filter
- Operating forces you to take pictures differently. Slower, more aware, somehow. , , analog (if one may say here)
- She's just an eye-catcher. If at all, not only photographers, but not like ne Nikon D4S. The also falls on, but since you will likely be asked for the press card, rather than after the camera name.

Improvements in practice
- Finer aperture setting. This of course is good - but makes a quick change slower / less precise. So for hectic not necessarily beneficial (for the camera but nothing)
- The small monitor in Monitor is ne gimmick. If I want to digital, I can easily switch. In everyday life, he irritates me more than it uses, but that may be personal preference

With me on the blog and on YouTube there first practical experience and of course the obligatory unboxing ...