absolutely realistic

The problem is many technical journal or hardcore gamers probably that Medal of Honor is always but always compared to Call of Duty. Of course, Medal of Honor is the competitor to the Game of the Year Modern Warfare on closer inspection are both games but very different.

The difference is obvious, while the CoD series is on rock-hard and also (unrealistic) action sequences and scenarios is the focus of Medal of Monor clearly in realism. Ie, no huge explosions or infinite opponents masses who simply need to be riveted by automatic fire only.
In this game, large amounts of enemies are (just like in real war) sown partially rah, here it is tactically proceed, not just straight on to shoot.
In addition, the Afghanistan setting to provide some variation.

Unfortunately, the season is a little too short in the single player mode with just under 5 hours.
Online mode only I could anzocken short works but with no problems (contrary to other reviews)
Graphic 1a and never as many write here "outdated"! Clear Settings see some not so "worn" out but the graphics are absolutely top and on the current state and need to certainly not before Modern Warfare 2 to hide.

Quite clear: to make EAZs game badly just because you of what Batman is accustomed else is downright unfair. Had EA copied in the competition would have but everyone complained it was a Call of Duty clone .... Finally I can say that EA is a solid shooter has succeeded in going out pleasantly from the competition due to product more realism.

My tip: If you like arcade action should Call of Duty series access who is on realism and tactics to buy the game from EA.

Oh, and war is not funny therefore there are only 1 star.