An answer, finally!

We know that the clever pamphlet Stéphane Hessel knows a great success in France and now abroad. Her answer is difficult. His past as a strong, his career, his reputation, his age and now his great success in front of him leave open doors, welcoming TV studios, the best seats stalls bookstores, mostly enthusiastic articles. However, one can find the indignation suggested by M Hessel somewhat predictable, and most clearly selective. Thus, silence and biases of the author of "outrage!" can they in turn arouse indignation if not bewilderment, at least suggested by the title of the response he has finally drawn: "I can not believe!", written at the request of Renaud Camus, published by Reinharc editions I can not believe! A response to Stéphane Hessel at the request of Renaud Camus.

Despite the terror, the book in response, that the author wanted the same size as the work to which he replied (and I strongly recommend to read in order to rebalance a word otherwise unanswerable despite its partisan) remained courteous and even respectful, without futile polemics or personal attack. It is nonetheless very firm and uncompromising iron door of the contradiction in amalgams and towers sleight Text "outrage!".

It was time!

While a number of critics have come here and there by to speak in the press after a first period of respectful deference to such a monument of "bienpensance" firmly told bristling with prestigious references paternalism and false bonhomie. But no real "replica" in good and due form, no "against" that truly opens the debate, raising objections good, asking the right questions, forcing so slightly to "set foot on earth."

So that is done: if "I can not believe! "Declined to be only a vehement anti-tract, preferring to take things more fine and thoughtful, it nonetheless addresses a text which, under cover of water in warm appearance, is at bottom a rant immigrationiste any hair and a dangerous maintenance operation of the general confusion of values, recovering and diverting shamelessly legacy of the Resistance. Its author, however, should know: indignation, which is always an appeal to emotion against reason, has in the past the most fatal ravages, it is a strong support for all manipulations.