I Nachem all Lumix FZ models had by and was switched to a DSLR camera, I was soon tired of lugging a kilo and more camera on the shoulder. Therefore I bought the Panasonic LX3 two years ago. I had always with you and have certainly made thousands of photos with it. The LX3 has inspired me, the only restriction was the somewhat scarce zoom range, which was barely suitable for portraits. Eventually, I was also tired, my reflex against guilty zuhaben. I have gained the LX5 and then dragged both cameras for a while. I have been working under varying conditions with both cameras and uses the same settings. Later I compared the recordings under Photoshop. Since I'm finally back on the floor. The Euro 1500 camera was no better than the LX5. Sure, in some ways (by drawing in lots of light and shade) it was better, but for landscapes the little one was absolutely equal. The small disadvantage compared to the expensive camera I have loosely balanced with Photoshop. In terms of resolution and noise performance, the LX5 is exemplary, with the colors it tends to a slight reddish tint, green is also strongly emphasized. But the love and yes, the Japanese Photoshop eliminate the error by pressing Alt-Ctrl-L (B) immediately. For me also it was important that the camera quickly come round to when triggers. This is also excellent, so even Snapshots (sports etc) are not a problem. A must see in my eyes is the electronic viewfinder that displays the disadvantage of balances in sun or bright light. A suitable lightning Panasonic I have (used, inexpensive) then also risen. And the reflex? A Ebayer will rejoice, they went for 700 euros on their way. The only alternative that I would not see my LX5, would be a system camera with interchangeable lenses. But of this I am still miles away. Oh, I renounce completely on the modes preferences, but use only P, A and S, as settings.