per:
- AAA (3x) Standard Batteries (no stupid special formats)
- The weight is acquired constant. So weigh even after repeated it the same. Compared to an old scale arise in me 0.4kg deviation, while exactly the same result can be read with my girlfriend. Well what scale it is now to blame no idea, but I rather suspect the old .....
- Operation is easy. At first I was puzzled how to "enabled", not on it just make short, but with his foot shortly afterwards tap (but with some force) is sufficient. Must advance with Arrow up the person be selected, otherwise only the weight is measured for body fat measurement. This could perhaps be annoying for some people immobile, but for me all is well as far as ....
negative:
- The balance requires a flat, steady surface, ie tiles eg on a carpet I weighed 14kg and would probably clinically dead Reason: The scale is usually centered on what probably should not be, but if you had installed here easy nen double bottom. or at least long feet (may just 3-4mm) installed, the problem would probably already solved .... For a star deduction
neutral:
- The measurement of body fat, water and muscle mass is extremely dependent on what parameters for choosing. Body size and age is unique, but the level of activity is a rather subjective thing. One can choose from A1 (little) -A5 (much). With me a change from A2 to A3 hurry up 7% more body fat from ..... Subjectively I would estimate in the middle.
There are in the network "Optical Tables", where simple times people are ready and the body fat percentage is next to it and you just rough times may themselves classify themselves .... ("gogle image search" body fat ").
The whole should I guess eh not be taken for super accurate, but rather to demonstrate a long-term trend. If I have 7% more body fat after a year and a similar amount of cradle, I probably still a few pretty body, because I just did too little sport ...
- Display: The readability of the display is borderline. Weight ok, but body fat, etc. could be a bit bigger, especially the symbol of what is for now just shown. But well, that is a point of criticism, but now also nciht so dramatic that I would pull it nen Stern.
Conclusion:
If one sets up the scale on tiles and not on carpet (with carpet must have a board under it) is all good. Weight appears reliable, standard batteries, and the measured values of body fat, water content, etc. seem to me also in a realistic range (which is working here with comma, however absurd, because the error is likely to be no mean feat, as with all cars!)
