Now perhaps the most debated point: fuel consumption.
My driving profile has not really changed over the previous ridden kilometers. (Relative equal distances in the week) Relaxed and foresighted driving on highway and in the city alternate with fast driving onto the highway. Especially on the highway, I believe, determine less consumption.
In general I feel that with my driving profile, the fuel consumption has lowered generally slow somewhat.
I had in-described driving behavior during the winter months usually an average fuel consumption to the 9L / 100km (even before filling the cleaner this year), so I reach currently approximately 8L / 100km.
After adjusting this to the certainly one or the other inaccuracy, as will become apparent to me still an estimated 0.5 liter less fuel per 100km. I can compare the again until after the current 3. tankful the 2,000km range of the product are exceeded. From the 4th filling should possibly be. The observed benefits run back into its opposite.
As I said, very much based solely on feeling, because I can not measure it.
Because of gefühleten changes to the previous state I am, however, (without knowing exactly what he doing exactly) very pleased with the cleaner!
Supplement 02.10.2015
Now that I have compared a year and no, I still come to the conclusion that it is with me (it is the emphasis) has come to fuel savings through the use of the additive.
Mind you I have in mind that after passing through the tank filling, the next (after pouring the additive) consumption was lower in direct comparison 2000km later, when everything was definitely through.
After consumption of the filled-additive of between consumption went slowly back up. But Here I emphasize, I am talking of 0.5 - 1 liter more per 100km.
Even now currently in the winter when driving through snow and ice to reach an average of only a maximum of 8,0- 8,2l. I am satisfied with.