Subversive 1

The method Lafay slipped what can be called a scoop to the industry of bodybuilding / fitness by offering a serious workout, inexpensive and very effective in the face of subscriptions room and noisy trade supplements vendors filled with dubious scientificity . The weight to body weight is less risky than cast iron because there has never imposed overload. Here is compensated by short recovery times that severely congested muscles and there will also work endurance. As for those who say that to inflate muscles must end up pushing very heavy, more than allowed by our own body in order to "shock" the muscle, we should tell them that most practitioners have no desire to look like Schwarzenegger and other monsters but simply acquire an athletic and harmonious physical that gives the body the essential functions that are flexibility, strength and endurance. The method used for much closer in the context of a sport.

So certainly if your goal is bodybuilding, forget, by cons if your goal is to take 10, 15 or 20kg of dry muscle, which totally transforms you, I sincerely recommend Lafay. You really have to invest (financially as a traction bar costs within 30, and a stand with X strings dips for the same price), but it is satisfying to successfully build muscles independently. In just a month of practice, and working only legs I've been able to 1kg. I start the whole body at the top level and I can already see the results happen. The only fault I find is that it trapezius (upper part) are addressed only in high levels although they are a little worked during dips. Many have said that the biceps are not worked which is wrong because the are in the supine traction. More natural movement and less traumatic to the joints of the arm curl.

Most of the negative commentators are obviously people who are unable to be alone in a rigorous workout at home. That is understandable but do not blame the method provided. The others are people who clearly have some interests to harm the author. Why argue? Strength training is not a science, rather than nitpick on anatomical or nutritional theories that only change every 5 years in the world of bodybuilding, this method has made all the merit of proposing concrete failing a Scientific unpacking will in any case questioned in a few years.

For my part but positive, this method converts both physically and mentally.