Holmes himself has always had the right not to want to bother with banalities and he süchtelte always on the complexity. So Sir Arthur has created him and under his pen Holmes would hardly have wanted a safecracker to let him test a safe.
The other turns of the story are certainly nice, but often inconclusive and sometimes very, very deliberate.
A previous speaker here already identified a number of deficiencies that have pushed me well.
The new cases like fall on that individual details in tandem Holmes / Watson, who has the Maritim series with the men and Rhode Groeger sequence to 60 cultivated so well, are too heavily loaded as carryovers.
So the Trotteligkeit and Wirrniss Watson is now just too pronounced, as the ongoing correction by Holmes, the Christian Rhode unfortunately leaves from time to time be a little too brash and relaxed.
This applies, in principle, not only for this series, and is sometimes more, sometimes less pronounced.
Maybe a nice comparison, but really not so imperative that indications are that gives us the story, especially at the beginning, on current topics time.
Conflict on the African Kontinet, banking crisis, misappropriation, predatory capitalism on the stock market, etc.
Pleasing were the speakers who as always deliver a great game, and especially has me doing the bye pleased with Lothar Blum Hagen! The incomparably excellent already the intended method for Roger Moore (in the two, as Brett Sinclair) and John Hiller man (Major Higgins in Magnum) has synchronized.
