I have the Galaxy Camera in London bought the day before she was Introduced worldwide, at 7:11. I have so far been given to the 200 photos that were partly amazingly well, but partly also disappointing poorly. The software is decent, but the image gallery needs partially several minutes until it has loaded all thumbnails from my numerous albums on Google + / Picasa and Dropbox, which they unfortunately do at every call again. Images with low Lichtstaerke be neat and shake rare in the dark is it - of course, this is also at a much more expensive DSLR - impossible to expose a clear picture without a tripod or fixed up / conditioning. Even with ISO100 dark areas are quite grobkoernig in ISO3200, the maximum setting, of course the worse. The same is, however, even with good lighting, details of, for example, grass or foliage blur like the pixels sea. Ultimately, we must not forget that one technically a Samsung WB850F has going on, you get half price the Galaxy Camera. By but you can not edit photos or post them even by as Facebook directly via UMTS. Who just needs a Point and Shoot Knips box and all the gadgets like the great big touch screen and everything that comes with Android not want should not spend so much money. There is no real alternative, the Nikon Coolpix S800C does not cost much less than the Samsung with Android, but makes much less and also provides no better photos for everyone else. The Galaxy Camera is for me a very leistungsfaehiges Android device with a very decent zoom lens, which is also much more mobile than a more expensive DSLR also due to their size and is enough for snapshots and meets high demands, thanks to its countless adjustment possibilities and program options. Negative points such as the lack of manual white balance in the automatic mode or the lack end detailed elaboration are indeed aergerlerich, but ultimately no camera is unfortunately perfectly.
