And because after fire ships without interest (plagiarized them!) Is alleged charges; you can also get the right to discuss them. Here is an excerpt from a little more serious analysis on the subject that seems passionate (about off-): "In fact, the whole question is whether the work of Bettelheim constitutes an original contribution and sufficiently different from that of heuscher (1963). The answer Heuscher himself to that question is, to say the least, surprising. His answer is "yes." Referring to statements of Heuscher, in an interview conducted in 1997, Jacobsen (2000) Note:. "I think Bettelheim is a very bright guy If he had noticed that it was a quote from a book, it probably would have said It would not have decreased. slightest value of his work. I rather suspect he took copious notes of all kinds, including books, and he used it to write his manuscript without realizing that this was a quote from read a book, and not something he himself had written. It always seemed that making a fuss, especially after the death of poor man was look at the price of fame pettiness "(p. 407). In the Los Angeles Times, February 7, 1991 Heuscher had already demonstrated a great tolerance, saying: "We are all plagiarists. And I do not escape the rule. Many times I do not know where I got an idea in my head or elsewhere ... If I have influenced Bruno Bettelheim, I'm just happy. " Sympathetic response from an author plagiarized "in
"Psychoanalysis of fairy tales, what a story," Serge Larivée Carole Senechal: Psychology Bulletin, No. 514, 2011/4.
So a very good book to deserved success written by an author with a complex personality, which as everyone has in his life, mistakes and beautiful things. He did not content himself - him - to spend time to erect inquisitor!