And by now determined 100 wide-angle shots outside during the day and also in churches such as at home I have to say that the light intensity to make more a positive impact. Only drawback that I could continue to use my polarizing filter no longer that 3,5er has 82mm filter diameter.
Slight distortion in the 10mm range can be ascertained at the edges. That's it then to criticisms.
The image quality is enormous. At maximum aperture, the images are noticeably clearer than the 4-5.6 counterpart. The increased light intensity can be photographed free in naves. Altars and organs succeed wonderfully.
The imaging performance by day in the open field is still NEN tick more accurately before. The pictures are a bit sharper at f 5.6. And the AF fits like ne one where he is also pushed towards.
The lens is processed as high quality, The feel is usual high quality and "home". Nothing rattles. The lens cap has been revised. So my 3,5er now similar to Tamron Lens covers stable Einraster who no longer tends the lid too much play and even falls down again.
The adjuster for AF / MF is Passignano and the rings for focus and focal length are wonderful in their sockets and feel also wertig on.
Most buyers opt for the far more favorable 4-5.6 lens. Who has thus gained his experience and as I had nothing to complain about except for the manglende light intensity, which is rewarded with this purchase quasi.
And did someone who has no experience with an ultra-wide angle and is not afraid to pay the price for it, which I put this class lens warmly. Once with 10mm focal length photographed at this quality and it can not you go and especially her not give it away.
One more sentence .... the lens I bought a polarizing filter from Hama. However, even with its higher construction is not limited to the filter the viewing area even at 10mm. Therefore need not be a slimline filter.
