Compare Graef WA 85 vs.  Chloer 189

Compare Graef WA 85 vs. Chloer 189

Graef waffle maker WA 85, stainless steel high gloss (household goods)

Customer Review

I see in this recession the waffle irons Graef WA 85 with the Cloer 189 waffle maker both in stainless steel.

Equipment processing
************************
Both devices are structurally almost identical, the Graef is processed but much higher quality. The housing is made of solid steel sheet counter Chloer here you get the feeling you press a thin sheet of poor quality. Both devices have a flexible hinge for a better absorption of the waffle. The drip-edge when Graef is slightly higher, so that the device can be cleaned a little lighter after use.
A major disadvantage of Chloer 189 is definitely the lead of the power cable, this is the front panel, which proves to be very disadvantageous in practice. When baking dough frequently runs out of the unit who then often runs into the cover from the power cord. This durability is certainly very limited. This technical aberration was also the reason that I have converted the unit.

When Graef WA 85 the power cord runs normally rear of the unit where it does not interfere with natural.

The Graef WA 85 also shines inside with many technical highlights. The device has two antihaftbeschichte classic heart waffle plates with a diameter of 20 cm. The unit can be opened by a stable very well thermally insulated handle.
It has an automatic timer that signaled by the color red and blue when the operating temperature is reached bzw.wann the waffles are dibasic. The browning levels can be easily set via LED display in 6 different levels. An audible signal additionally informs about when the waffles are done. When Chloer everything is set manually by flicking a switch otherwise the process is almost the same.

Practical application
*****************
The Graef is rapidly heated the optical display is long red. Upon reaching the operating temperature the indicator will illuminate blue. Then the dough is filled, the display then goes back to red and finished waffle again on Blue also an acoustic signal, I always bake at level 3. The Graef waffle maker bakes quickly despite its comparatively low output of 850 watts will sound very nice golden brown waffles that can be easily solved by the coating. The Chloer is also very good with its slightly higher output of 930 watts while baking waffles.
The power cord can be easily connect both devices to the device bottom wrap.

The handle when Graef is well insulated so you do not get hot hands when operating. When Chloer the handle consists of a single piece of plastic angeklebtem, this is not as well insulated and is very warm and also built still behind the hinge and on the device plastic. Because here here developed very much temperature the shelf life is affected too.

Conclusion
*****
Overall, the Graef WA 85 Waffle land is much higher quality than the processed almost identical Chloer 189. The Graef is much easier in many important details to handle. But the biggest advantage is the simple cable management at the back of the device. The durability is not affected as the chlorine waffle iron. That the devices priced not differ too much, therefore my choice fell on the Graef WA 85

Pro Graef WA 85
***************
Very high quality finish
Easy To Use
Bakes beautiful delicious Golden brown waffles
Good visual indication + Buzzer
Easy cleaning

Contra
******
So far noticed nothing

Please feel the usefulness of each review fair to evaluate by clicking on the "Yes" or "No" button. This will help other customers to keep track of your product reviews.

Related Reviews


Comparative review of three prophylaxis bandagesMueller ATF Ankle Brace, white, 36-38, 43360 (Equipment) Incredibly good and compact. Plus: compared to Sony NEX5NSony DSC-RX100 Cyber-shot digital camera (20 megapixels, optical zoom 3.6x, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, fast aperture. 28 - 100 mm zoom lens F1.8 - 4.9, Full HD image stabilized) (Electronics) Sharpness compared to the 600D worseCanon EOS 700D Digital SLR Camera (18 Megapixel, 7.6 cm (3 inches) touch screen, Full HD, Live View) only housing (electronics) A hitherto unique compact camera (compared with Fuji X10, Canon S95, Sony NEX-5N, Canon 40D)Sony DSC-RX100 Cyber-shot digital camera (20 megapixels, optical zoom 3.6x, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, fast aperture. 28 - 100 mm zoom lens F1.8 - 4.9, Full HD image stabilized) (Electronics) Test incl. Compared to a55, a57, a65, EOS600, EOS650Sony SLT-A58K SLR digital camera (20.1 megapixels, 6.7 cm (2.7 inch) LCD screen, APS HD CMOS sensor, HDMI, USB 2.0) incl. SAL 18-55mm lens (Electronics) Upgrading the X10 - Is the X30 still relevant? Compared with other compactFujifilm X30 Digital Camera (12MP, 4x opt. Zoom, HDMI, USB 2.0) (Electronics) Quite well but compared to the Bose SoundLink mini short of expectationsGrundig GSB 500 Bluetooth Speaker (Electronics) Good, but too expensive compared to R400Logitech Professional Presenter R800 radio, presentation equipment, PC / Mac (Electronics) A review which will allow us to compare with the S4Samsung Galaxy S5 smartphone (5-inch display, 16GB of memory, Android 5) charcoal-black (Wireless Phone) Great toothbrush, but compared to the FlexCare ...?Philips Sonicare HX9332 / 04 DiamondClean sonic toothbrush, ceramic white (Personal Care) Compare Tip Toi vs. Ting-bookRavensburger 00502 - tiptoi: Starter Set with pen and book (Toys) Reduced power consumption and increased by a factor of 3 durability compared to its predecessorSamsung MZ-75E250B / EU EVO 850 internal SSD 250GB (6.4 cm (2.5 inches), SATA III) black (accessories) Compare: 16GB SDHC Transcend vs. 16GB SDHC Samsung (both Class 10)Transcend Extreme Speed ​​SDHC 16GB Class 10 memory card (up to 20MB / s read) [Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging] (Personal Computers) Compare: 8GB Transcend SDHC vs. 16GB SDHC Samsung (both Class 10)Transcend Extreme Speed ​​SDHC 8GB Class 10 Memory Card (up to 20MB / s read) [Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging] (Personal Computers) Canon S110 compared to other high-quality compact ...Canon PowerShot S110 Digital Camera (12.1 Megapixels, 5x opt. Zoom, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, Full HD, HDMI) black (Electronics) unfortunately disappointing compared to the Sony DSC-RX100 IIICanon PowerShot G7 Digital Camera X (20.2 megapixels, 4.2x opt. Zoom, WiFi, NFC) (Electronics) Comparative evaluationSony DSC-HX7VB Digital Camera (16 Megapixel, 10x opt. Zoom, Full HD video recording, GPS, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, image stabilized) (Electronics) Compared with the original battery rather weakAnsmann A-5044173 OLY BLS-1 battery with 7.4V / 1000mAh for Olympus E 400 / E 410 (Electronics)