Review superfluous

How should one evaluate an artist and his new album, if one is totally biased? I have almost all the albums, the "Sampler" except me, and I like them all. Wader has followed me for 40 years and you could tell that he got a bit older. What do you expect otherwise. Except for "Turn, Turn, Turn", which I immediately skipped after the first few bars, I do not immediately noticed that there are more 4 cover versions.

Does it have to be that way? Especially since he has previously made fun of himself in a song about a "coverer".

What more annoying is its somewhat quarkige debate, accompanied by a peculiar hissing sibilance which runs through his songs since "never go back". Maybe that should be a bit cool, perhaps it is only the third set of teeth.

The instrumental arrangements are without reproach and sound at a good system really sensational. And his typical guitar picking style is simply a number of its own. I wish I had reached this level.

Therefore, there is a whopping five points. I would have given even twenty.

Wader Wader is!