Marginal criticism.

In addition to the older model of the Kindle Paperwhite, I have now also the Tolino vision. The main reason for the purchase was the open system, so that I am able to read ePubs and other files without converting annoying.
Although skeptical at first, I am now convinced of the device. The typeface is actually not as contrasty as the Kindle, but what struck me most positively, is the noticeably lower weight and the comfortable flat surface. The fact that the white balance easily goes to yellow, I think even more enjoyable than the bright white snow of the Kindle Paperwhite. When most books you look at times, have the fewest so pungent white pages like the Kindle. Since a book is not a traffic sign, I find the (really only slight) yellowness much more pleasant reading.
The problem with fragments that are sometimes seen after the turning is to me previously only noticed when the machine. In the case I leaf easy fast one page forward and back, and the fragments are gone. A barely noticeable effort, in my opinion.

Meanwhile, I read a lot better on the Tolino and am curious what Amazon is abschauen of the Tolino yet. The flat surface and the lower weight are definitely a must for future developments of the Kindle.

Recently my biggest gripe really, who is both the Kindle and the Tolino: The damn logo or other distinctive sign on the front. I can not imagine why the manufacturers want to place your logo in constant field of view which is probably sublime brainwashing, but I stick the logos from always, so that I can enjoy my book in peace and the logo is not constantly flashes in the corner of my eye. Maybe Amazon can indeed bring itself to produce the first e-eader without disturbing elements on the front. Even Apple produces its Macbook now so that you need to see any logo in the unfolded state and which I find awesome.