WD WD60EFRX internal HDD 3 5 inches

Categories


  • Impressive performance  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    Thought long about which disk should I replace my 5 year old already 2TB large panels take and have decided here for this, although some reviews not exactly sound very friendly. In the end it was the combination of price, size and reputation, what ma
  • New Synology DS213 + plate for  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    Thus, the pulse is down again. I have long struggled with me to create this panel - I needed more space in my NAS. Nearly two years (14,500 hours, according to SMART, a panel A has reported CRC error - that's to abnormalities in two years) have two W
  • WD60EFRX in Qnap TS-659Pro2, read my ordeal ....  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    Am now in possession of 8 pieces. WD60EFRX for Windows computer I can not give negative feedback, the drive is fast, quiet and stable, but from what I would caution is to operate these currently in a Qnap TS-659Pro2 (Raid5 or even 6) with firmware 4.
  • Megagoile HD ...  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    which in my computer very high read and write speeds have. Copy a 21 GB video file: internal SATA to SATA internal WD60EFRX approximately 140 MB / s internal SATA WD60EFRX to SMB server via Gigabit Ethernet 100 MB / s internal SATA WD60EFRX on NFS se
  • 2/6 defective hard disks after 24 hours  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    I need to connect the many negative comments I unfortunately. After more than 24 hours duration lived only four of six plates. For me, however not at Qnap o.ae. but on a normal RAID controllers (3ware 9650SE) or even on-board controller. The first we
  • Defect after only 600 hours of operation  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    Unfortunately, I can also call inadequately the WD60EFRX. After about 600 hours of operation first read errors are in this WD RED occurred and my NAS (QNAP HS-210) has the status on a little later "abnormal" set with the recommendation to r
  • Defect after 2 weeks  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    Already after 2 weeks was a defect of 2 HDs, although no major file action ran. Let's see how long the other holds.
  • Qnap and, unfortunately, problems  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    I must unfortunately also classified in the 1-star category. Already for years a Qnap TS459-ProII. Had 4 or 5 years 2TB Seagate Green plates in it that were not really suitable for 24/7. So wanted in favor of data security now appropriate disks, on w
  • Perfect NAS drive  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    I have now installed over a month ago, the WD WD60EFRX (6TB) in a QNAP NAS. And I can now say: "I am thrilled!" No reading errors, data throughput is perfect and it is quiet enough so they do not interfere.
  • Bad sectors  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    I have this drive formatted with ext4 and played for hours. A hard drive test seemed first not make sense because the plate was new, and a test would take given the size safely several hours / days. But I would have had better on my feeling heard. I
  • so far no problems 2  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    I've risked (now, where I write these lines to keep positive and negative reviews just the scale) and even ordered me two pieces of it. A third is already ordered, but will take probably a few weeks lt. Amazon. Although the first two were originally
  • Huge capacity, economical, fast enough (and expensive)  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    After 2x last year the WD40EZRX (Green) bought, and no problems have arisen (no warnings in SMART) I have now bought a 6TB WD HD. Instead of about 150 about 215 would be due for the Green model. I was the first time opt for the more expensive Red mod
  • WD6 TB  

    WD WD60EFRX internal hard drive (8.9 cm (3.5 inches), 64MB cache, SATA) (Personal Computers)
    I have installed this board in a NAS company Synology (413J). The board ran right away and returns like any other built-in NAS WD drives excellent values. In the "continuous operation" after about a week no problem occurred. The temperature rang